|
Wet is good but too wet is bad |
|
|
|
Written by Daniel Steinmann
|
|
Page 1 of 2
A quick internet search brought up over 5000 references to
the floods in Owamboland showing me how far and wide this calamity has
attracted attention. It is a human disaster of
unprecedented proportions, and as we managed to establish a week ago, is not
the result of the Angolans diverting the Cunene to complete the Xangongo
bridge. It is nature gone haywire. I could not find a single person alive who
remembers any similar occurrence or comparable flooding, not in the last 50
years. So, by all standards, for Owambo to flood to that extent, is way out of
the ordinary.
The Cuvelai system that covers large areas of the Omusati
and Oshana regions is a natural water course that is supposed to flood every
year. But this controlled and fairly predictable flooding consists of water
slowly migrating south from the feeder areas in southern Angola. This
phenomenon is known as the Efundja and without it, life cannot be sustained in
the northern regions.
The Efundja replenishes dry soil and brings relief to both
humans and animals. It brings with it a wealth of nourishment for the earth as
it deposits suspended nutrients into the oshonas or shallow pans which
basically are the visible links in the otherwise bone-dry Cuvelai chain. Only
once the oshonas start filling up, does one realise it is a vast interconnected
system.
The Efundja also bring a bountiful supply of fish and other
aquatic creatures, the first which is exploited directly by the residents and
the second which sustains a complex web of animal and plant life that supports
the region's overall ecology. The Efundja is suppose to flood otherwise the
people there cannot survive, but the Efundja is not suppose to turn into a
torrent and cover the entire area. Then the people also cannot survive as we
have experienced over the past six weeks.
There is a growing consensus that the floods we are
experiencing are not a mere blimp on the screen, - a sort of freak occurrence
which nature will not repeat for another fifty years - but a direct consequence
of Earth in turmoil, and as long as so-called civilised man continues to
destroy nature, the backlash will also grow in severity. In simple language it
means we must prepare for many more floods.
The economic question is how much this will still cost us in
future and what damage we will suffer as a result. The political question,
however, is, who is responsible and who will pay for this?
There is no doubt in my mind that the advanced nations and
their relentless pursuit of growth and profit, are the reason why we in Namibia
now have to suffer. But when I think back when the whole issue of Third World
debt became such a hot topic and I compare the amounts we talked about then to
the astronomical costs we now face, the disparity slaps me in the face.
|