|
Do we really need the RED system? |
|
|
|
Written by Staff Reporters
|
|
Page 1 of 2
Dear Editor
The recent news that Walvis Bay Plastic
Products is now moving to Botswana and one of the reason therefore given was a
fact, that it has to pay up to N$1.25 mil as so-called “Network Contribution”.
This has sparked my reaction.
The establishment of the RED system immediately caused a price
increase of 10% in electricity tariffs, whereupon the Local Authorities
increased their rates and taxes twice by about 10% due to a lack of income they
normally had by the sales of electricity.
In July we experienced another increase in
electricity tariffs in Swakopmund of 18% on electricity after Nampower raised
their unit by about 15%, whereas the Omaruru farmers experienced an increase of
about 36%. Although the Electricity Control Board does not allow any variation
more than 15%, this was approved by them. The tariffs of the prepaid metering
system as installed at our poorer community were also increased with an unheard
amount.
This, however, proves not to be enough to compensate
for the funds needed for the RED system. They are now implementing the
so-called “Network Contribution” wherever they can with astronomical amounts,
as can be seen with the Walvis Bay affair.
Developers are being charged with huge
amounts, without proof of how such amounts are calculated, you just have to pay
up. It happened, that “Network Contribution” is being charged if a client
wishes to increase his connection from say 40 Amps to 60 Amps, but no refund is
given if one reverses the demand to a lesser one.
It is difficult for us to understand the
difference between the need of “Basic Charges” and “Network Contribution”, but
the latter certainly proves to be an open cheque book for the electricity
distributor. Previously, any surpluses made by local authorities were placed
into funds used for capital developments, but in this case, this seems to be
not enough to cover operating expenses.
The question here is: are those
contributions really being placed into special funds to improve our network, or
are they just being used to cover operating losses? Does the same apply to the
“Basic Charges”?
|