|
Page 1 of 3
The internet can unite far greater numbers
behind a single concept than ever before. It also has the power to allow every
single person to define a unique cultural aspect for him or herself.
In a not so recent column, I waffled on a
bit about how the internet, particularly the MP3, MP4, or whatever format
emerges, will change music. Recently, some or other band, took the first step
towards showing the way ahead with an announcement that they would only be
releasing singles in future, specifically with the internet in mind.
The reason for this step, they announced,
was that they could release the singles quicker and didn’t have to delay the
release while they cobbled together enough material for an album. I can relate
to the situation: I rarely find an album, or more appropriately a CD, with more
than three songs that hold my interest. Let’s have the singles and be done with
it. Think of it as a return to those small wax discs, but in a digital format.
That being said, I won’t be downloading any
of that particular band’s singles. It’s one of those fairly standard,
marginally alternative, ‘we’re-so-grunge-you-can-believe-in-us’ type of bands.
I hate template music. Something different with a large amount of passion gets
me ever time.
I have mixed feelings about the demise of
the album though. There were a whole bunch of excesses, and of course the
matter of artists slinging together mediocre songs to fill albums so that they
could release the one good song as a single, but more likely sell the more
expensive album in the hopes that at least parts of it would be almost as good
as the single.
On the other hand, there were genuinely
great albums where most of the material was as good as the single or singles.
No more ‘White Album’. No more ‘London Calling’. No more ‘Ziggy Stardust’,
still a jaw-dropping experience almost 40 years on. But how long will it be
before a compilation CD, ‘Greatest Internet Hits’ emerges on the shelves?
|